Comparison / WordPress alternatives
If WordPress is costing you speed, security, and sanity, here are the alternatives that actually fit a B2B marketing site, and how to choose between them.
Not sure which fits? Ask usWordPress powers a huge share of the web, but for a B2B company where the website is business-critical, its costs, constant plugin patching, performance overhead, and a real security surface, increasingly outweigh its convenience. If you're evaluating alternatives, the field sorts into a few clear options.
The strongest alternative for a serious B2B site is a static-first framework like Astro paired with a headless CMS such as Payload or Sanity. Webflow is a good visual-builder option with real limits at scale, and hosted site builders suit the smallest sites. Here's how they compare on what actually matters.
At a glance
| Astro + headless | Webflow | Hosted builder | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | Excellent (95+) | Good | Variable |
| Security surface | Near-zero | Low | Low |
| Plugins to patch | None | None | None |
| Content ownership | Full | Locked to Webflow | Locked to platform |
| Scales to | Large sites | Mid-size (item limits) | Small sites |
| Team editing | Headless CMS | Webflow editor | Platform editor |
| Best for | Serious B2B sites | Design-led mid sites | Simple sites |
Our take
For a B2B company leaving WordPress because it's business-critical, we build on Astro plus a headless CMS. It removes the plugin surface and performance tax entirely, gives you full ownership of content and code, and scales cleanly, while your marketing team edits through a CMS as simple as the WordPress admin they're leaving.
Webflow is a reasonable stop for design-led sites that won't hit its CMS item limits, and hosted builders are fine for the smallest brochures. But neither gives you the ownership, performance ceiling, or scale of a static-first stack, which is why it's our default recommendation for anyone whose website genuinely matters.
FAQ
For a B2B business where the website is business-critical, the strongest alternative is a static-first framework like Astro paired with a headless CMS such as Payload or Sanity. It eliminates the plugin patching and security surface of WordPress, delivers far better performance, and gives you full ownership, while keeping content editing simple for a non-technical team. Webflow and hosted builders are alternatives for smaller or design-led sites.
The main reasons are speed, security, and maintenance. WordPress runs PHP and a database on every request and relies on plugins that must be continually patched, each a potential vulnerability. For a business where the site sits in the sales cycle, that's ongoing cost and risk on your most public asset. Modern alternatives remove the plugin surface and the performance overhead entirely.
Not when it's done properly. A careful migration preserves your URLs and rankings by mapping redirects and carrying over metadata, moves content into a new CMS, and cuts over with zero downtime by building in parallel with your live site. The functionality your plugins provided, forms, SEO, analytics, is replaced with maintained equivalents. The result is a faster, more secure site with the same or better search visibility.
Start here
Tell us what you're building and we'll tell you honestly which option fits, even if it isn't us.
Honest advice · Even if it isn't us
Related